In Saudi Arabia, there is yet to be a single M.D.-Ph.D. program established despite calls for its implementation. Herein, the authors assess students’ and stakeholders’ perceived barriers and opinions towards the implementation of such a program. A mixed-method design was used. For the quantitative part, a sample of 190 medical students completed a pre-validated survey that addressed procedural, bureaucratic, and environmental challenges to the implementation of the program. In addition, three semi-structured interviews with stakeholders had been carried out to address the implementation of an M.D.-Ph.D. track. While the semi-structured interviews resulted in a wide array of responses, most students indicated that limited funding (55.7%) and predicted high workload (63.2%) were amongst the most significant hurdles to enrolling in an M.D.-Ph.D. if offered to do so. In addition, first-generation students and female students were less likely to encourage the establishment of such a program. This study reported multiple significant barriers to pursuing an M.D.-Ph.D. track in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The findings of this study reflect the complexity of implementing an M.D.-Ph.D. program in the country and can be useful for concerning bodies to holistically consider predicted barriers that students may face when establishing an M.D.-Ph.D.
Explorescholarly articles
"Cultural and academic barriers toward physician-scientist (M.D.-Ph.D.) careers: A mixed methods study"
Related Stories

Data, Assessment, & Evaluation
Staff Perceptions of First-in-Family Students in Higher Education: A Case Study of a Belgian College

Access and Persistence
“I Wasn’t Supposed to Be There”: Examining the Experiences of First-Generation Women of Color in Undergraduate STEM Majors

Data, Assessment, & Evaluation